Synthetic data · thresholds placeholder · scenario time D0 06:40 (SYN)O-09
Operations Command View
Are the businesses producing what they should, reliably and at the right cost?
ScopeGroup · all businessesPeriodP07 MTD (SYN)Last refresh06:25 (SYN)All values from the governed KPI model · Sep 2026 (certified month)Sources and lineage
ALERT: Entity A1 at 91.3 % of plan in Sep · shortfall 30.3 kt (316.8 of 347.1 kt) · Group 29.4 kt short | Supplier on-time delivery 90.4 % and Capacity utilisation 79.8 % below target
Production vs plan 95.5 % of planMTBF 270 hSupplier on-time delivery 91.4 %Emissions rising (▲ 17.3 vs Aug)
Production
Production vs plan · GroupiProduction (role)
On targetNear targetOff targetTargetNeedle = current value
Trend▲ 3.4% vs Aug (+3.2 % of plan)
Plan≥ 100.0% · var −4.5 pts
ActualTarget
▲ IncreasingHigh riskIntervention required
Production vs plan 95.5% of plan against a ≥100.0% target; Entity A1 at 91.3% of plan drives the gap.
Reliability
MTBF · Groupi
On targetNear targetOff targetTargetNeedle = current value
Trend▲ 27.4% vs Aug (+58 h)
Plan≥ 200 h · var +70 h
ActualTarget
▲ IncreasingLow riskOn track
MTBF 270 h against a ≥200 h target; Entity A1 at 165 h misses it.
Cost efficiency
Cost per tonne · GroupiFinance (role)
On targetNear targetOff targetTargetNeedle = current value
Trend▼ 7.3% vs Aug (−231 ₹/t)
Plan≤ 2,900 ₹/t · var +34 ₹/t
ActualTarget
▼ DecreasingHigh riskIntervention required
Cost per tonne 2,934 ₹/t against a ≤2,900 ₹/t target; Entity A2 at 3,017 ₹/t drives the gap.
Anomaly heat map · operating measures by area and risk level
AnswersWhere are the operating problems, and how serious are they?
Each cell counts the measures (per entity) in that area at that risk level, from the model status: Intervention required = High, Declining = Medium, On track or Improving = Low. Select a cell to list them.
Category / risk level
Low
Medium
High
Total
Production
6
Reliability
8
Cost
6
Supply
4
Total
11
7
6
24
Select a cell to list its signals here.
Production vs plani
▼ Decreasing since Apr
Entity A1 (% of plan)Entity A2 (% of plan)Plan 100%
AprMayJunJulAugSep
Entity A1 was below plan in every month (91.3% in Sep). Entity A2 met plan in Apr and Sep (100.3% in Sep).
Reliability trend · mean time to repairi
▲ Increasing since Apr
Entity A1 (h)Entity A2 (h)Target ≤ 6 h
AprMayJunJulAugSep
Repair time in Entity A1 rose every month, from 5.3 h in Apr to 8.2 h in Sep. Entity A2 is 6.2 h; both are above the 6 h target.
Sustainability curve · emissionsi
▼ Decreasing since Apr
Entity A1 (kt CO2e)Entity A2 (kt CO2e)
AprMayJunJulAugSep
Group emissions rose three months running, from 374.1 kt CO2e in Jun to 427.7 in Sep (+17.3 vs Aug).