        Synthetic data · thresholds placeholder · scenario time D0 06:40 (SYN)G-01
      

Portfolio Home

Which businesses and entities drive portfolio performance, and where must we intervene?

Scope Group · all entities Period P07 MTD (SYN) Last refresh 06:25 (SYN) 84% leadership KPIs certified · 1 material reconciliation break (BRK-SYN-0071) Sources and lineage

EBITDA YTDFIN-001

1,760.1₹ m

Improving

Up ₹397.0 m since August, mostly Entity A1.

Plant values for revenue YTD · SepShare of entity

Entity A16,972.3 ₹ m100%

Plant 01 (P01)1,892.8 ₹ m27%

Plant 02 (P02)2,089.6 ₹ m30%

Plant 03 (P03)2,990.0 ₹ m43%

Entity A26,839.0 ₹ m100%

Plant 04 (P04)1,749.6 ₹ m26%

Plant 05 (P05)2,890.8 ₹ m42%

Plant 06 (P06)2,198.5 ₹ m32%

Plants shown for revenue YTD, which drives it. Entity = total of its plants.

Plan— · var — Trend▲ 397.0 vs P05 Forecast—

AprSep

Actual · Apr–SepPlan

CERT P06 · PRELIM P07

Revenue YTDFIN-003

13,811.3₹ m

Improving

Up ₹2,335.8 m since August, mostly Entity A2.

Plant values · SepShare of entity

Entity A16,972.3 ₹ m100%

Plant 01 (P01)1,892.8 ₹ m27%

Plant 02 (P02)2,089.6 ₹ m30%

Plant 03 (P03)2,990.0 ₹ m43%

Entity A26,839.0 ₹ m100%

Plant 04 (P04)1,749.6 ₹ m26%

Plant 05 (P05)2,890.8 ₹ m42%

Plant 06 (P06)2,198.5 ₹ m32%

Entity = total of its plants.

Plan— · var — Trend▲ 2,335.8 vs P05 Forecast—

AprSep

Actual · Apr–SepPlan

CERT P06

Free cash flow YTDFIN-004

606.2₹ m

Improving

Up ₹157.4 m since August, mostly Entity A1.

Plant values for revenue YTD · SepShare of entity

Entity A16,972.3 ₹ m100%

Plant 01 (P01)1,892.8 ₹ m27%

Plant 02 (P02)2,089.6 ₹ m30%

Plant 03 (P03)2,990.0 ₹ m43%

Entity A26,839.0 ₹ m100%

Plant 04 (P04)1,749.6 ₹ m26%

Plant 05 (P05)2,890.8 ₹ m42%

Plant 06 (P06)2,198.5 ₹ m32%

Plants shown for revenue YTD, which drives it. Entity = total of its plants.

Plan— · var — Trend▲ 157.4 vs P05 Forecast—

AprSep

Actual · Apr–SepPlan

CERT P06

ROCE, annualisedFIN-005

11.6%

Intervention required

11.6%, below the 12.0% target, mainly Entity A1 (11.1%).

Plant values for capacity utilization · SepPull on entity

Entity A179.8%−5.2 pts

Plant 01 (P01)82.9%−0.5 pts

Plant 02 (P02)70.0%−5.1 pts

Plant 03 (P03)86.1%+0.4 pts

Entity A287.6%+2.5 pts

Plant 04 (P04)89.5%+1.2 pts

Plant 05 (P05)90.0%+2.1 pts

Plant 06 (P06)82.9%−0.7 pts

Plants shown for capacity utilization, which drives it. Entity = its plants combined (not averaged). Red = off target.

Plan≥ 12.0% · var −0.4 pts Trend▲ 1.1 vs P05 Forecast—

AprSep

Actual · Apr–SepPlan

CERT P06

Projected EBITDA gap, rest of yearPRD-003

-56.2₹ m

Declining Pending certification

-₹56.2 m, below the ₹0.0 m target in both entities.

Plant values for production at risk · SepShare of entity

Entity A130.9 kt100%

Plant 01 (P01)3.7 kt12%

Plant 02 (P02)24.3 kt79%

Plant 03 (P03)2.9 kt10%

Entity A25.9 kt100%

Plant 04 (P04)0.0 kt0%

Plant 05 (P05)0.0 kt0%

Plant 06 (P06)5.9 kt100%

Plants shown for production at risk, which drives it. Entity = total of its plants.

Plan≥ 0.0 ₹ m · var −56.2 ₹ m Trend▼ 17.3 vs P05 Forecast—

AprSep

Actual · Apr–SepPlan

PREDICTION

Focus of this page

Entity contribution to projected EBITDA variance · P07–P12 · ₹ m

AnswersWhich entity accounts for the projected EBITDA gap?

Sorted by contribution; every entity shown, never only the Group average. Total −56.2 (FCST, SYN).

LegendNeeds attentionOthers

Entity A1

−48.5 Supply event

Entity A2

−7.7 

Financial performance · Entity A1 vs Entity A2 · Sep

AnswersHow do the two entities compare on financial performance?

Model values; Group is recalculated from both entities' inputs. Small lines under each entity: its plant values for Sep.

LegendP01 = Plant 1, P02 = Plant 2, P03 = Plant 3 (Entity A1) · P04 = Plant 4, P05 = Plant 5, P06 = Plant 6 (Entity A2)

Scope

EBITDA YTD

Revenue YTD

Free cash flow YTD

ROCE

FCF conversion (FCF ÷ EBITDA)

Projected EBITDA gap, rest of year

Entity A1

▲ 890.6 ₹ m

▲ 6,972.3 ₹ mP01 1,892.8 ₹ m · P02 2,089.6 ₹ m · P03 2,990.0 ₹ m

▲ 337.6 ₹ m

▼ 11.1%

✓ 37.9%

▼ -48.5 ₹ m

Entity A2

▲ 869.5 ₹ m

▲ 6,839.0 ₹ mP04 1,749.6 ₹ m · P05 2,890.8 ₹ m · P06 2,198.5 ₹ m

▲ 268.6 ₹ m

✓ 12.1%

▼ 30.9%

▼ -7.7 ₹ m

Group

▲ 1,760.1 ₹ m

▲ 13,811.3 ₹ m

▲ 606.2 ₹ m

▼ 11.6%

▼ 34.4%

▼ -56.2 ₹ m

Plants with a variation · Financial performance

AnswersWhich plants sit behind the financial performance numbers?

Plant

Entity

KPI

Sep value

Variation

Plant 02 (P02)

Entity A1

OPS-002 Sales vs plan

77.6%

−22.4 pts vs target

Plant 02 (P02)

Entity A1

OPS-001 Production vs plan

78.4%

−21.6 pts vs target

Plant 02 (P02)

Entity A1

CST-001 Cost per tonne

3,245 ₹/t

+345 ₹/t vs target

Plant 04 (P04)

Entity A2

CST-001 Cost per tonne

3,276 ₹/t

+376 ₹/t vs target

Plant 01 (P01)

Entity A1

OPS-002 Sales vs plan

92.8%

−7.2 pts vs target

Plant 01 (P01)

Entity A1

OPS-001 Production vs plan

96.0%

−4.0 pts vs target

Plant 05 (P05)

Entity A2

CST-001 Cost per tonne

3,012 ₹/t

+112 ₹/t vs target

Plant 06 (P06)

Entity A2

OPS-001 Production vs plan

96.3%

−3.7 pts vs target

ROCE by entity · per month

AnswersIs the gap between the entities opening or closing?

Entity A1 · CERTEntity A2 · CERTGroup · CERTTarget ≥ 12

Reading · Financial performance

CERTROCE: Entity A1 11.1%, Entity A2 12.1%, Group 11.6% (target ≥ 12). Entity A1 is the one off track.

CERT6 of 6 plants show a variation on these measures; the largest: Plant 02 (OPS-002 sales vs plan 77.6%), Plant 04 (CST-001 cost per tonne 3,276 ₹/t), Plant 01 (OPS-002 sales vs plan 92.8%). Plant detail and root causes are in the Entity lens.