Are assets producing what they promised, entity versus entity?
Production vs plan 95.5% of plan against a ≥100.0% target; Entity A1 at 91.3% of plan drives the gap.
Capacity utilization 83.4% against a ≥85.0% target; Entity A1 at 79.8% (unplanned downtime) drives the gap.
OEE 84.1% against a ≥80.0% target; both entities meet it (Entity A1 80.2%, Entity A2 88.4%).
Cost per tonne 2,934 ₹/t against a ≤2,900 ₹/t target; Entity A2 at 3,017 ₹/t drives the gap.
Unplanned downtime 154 h, down 10 vs Aug; largest move Entity A2, down 34.
Sales vs plan 95.2% of plan against a ≥100.0% target; Entity A1 at 89.2% of plan drives the gap.
AnswersWhich entity will under-produce, and by how much?
AnswersHow does each entity compare on output, efficiency, reliability and cost?
Each row is recalculated from that entity's own inputs; Group from the summed inputs of both entities.
AnswersWhich plants explain the entity numbers?
Plants that miss target on OPS-001, PLT-002, CST-001, REL-003, sorted by gap to target (at most 5). Plant values are shown here only to explain the entity number; working detail is in the Entity lens.