Plant and Production Performance

Production vs plan: 91.3% against a ≥100% target (−8.7 pts); Plant 02 (78.4%) accounts for 7.6 of the 8.7 pts gap.

Root cause: Plant 02 made 95.2 of 121.5 kt planned. 78.2 h of unplanned downtime cost 14.8 kt (56% of its 26.2 kt shortfall), led by asset P02-03 on Line L2 (29 h of downtime). RM-1 cover is the secondary risk (4 days to breach).

Asset utilization: 91.9% against a ≥90% target (+1.9 pts); Plant 02 off target, offset by the other plants.

Root cause: Plant 02 ran 624.3 of 720 calendar hours (86.7%), losing 78.2 h to unplanned downtime, led by asset P02-03 on Line L2 (29 h of downtime).

OEE: 80.2% against a ≥80% target (+0.2 pts); Plant 02 off target, offset by the other plants.

Root cause: Plant 02 made 95.2 of 121.5 kt planned. 78.2 h of unplanned downtime cost 14.8 kt (56% of its 26.2 kt shortfall), led by asset P02-03 on Line L2 (29 h of downtime). RM-1 cover is the secondary risk (4 days to breach).

Capacity utilization: 79.8% against a ≥85% target (−5.2 pts); Plant 02 (70.0%) accounts for 5.1 of the 5.2 pts gap.

Root cause: Plant 02 made 95.2 of 121.5 kt planned. 78.2 h of unplanned downtime cost 14.8 kt (56% of its 26.2 kt shortfall), led by asset P02-03 on Line L2 (29 h of downtime). RM-1 cover is the secondary risk (4 days to breach).

Yield: 91.5% against a ≥92% target (−0.5 pts); Plant 03 (90.4%) moves it −0.7 pts, partly offset by Plant 02.

Root cause: Plant 03 yield is 90.4% (down 1.7 pts vs Aug), below the ≥92% target. The model records no process cause; this needs a plant process review.

Recovery %: 87.5% against a ≥88% target (−0.5 pts); Plant 03 (85.7%) moves it −1.1 pts, partly offset by Plant 01.

Root cause: Plant 03 recovered 31,527 t of 36,789 t contained in feed (85.7%, down 3.4 pts vs Aug). The model records no process cause; this needs a plant process review.